everyone's blogging abt the world cup and its getting dull. FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE! FRANCE!
haha.
i figured i hafta do 2 topics every week day. thats alot of work.
aye, was chatting with one of my frens from my cca over sat afternoon and sth suddenly hit me like never before, and i start to have a very different perspective of the traditional churches. (i'm from a much more charismatic church).
charismatic churches are characterised by what we call, the physical manifestations of the Spirits, and the gifts of the Spirit, which includes speaking in different tongues, interpreting tongues, healing, prophecying, word of wisdom, word of knowledge, discernment of spirits, faith, miraculous power. other things that are part of the character of a charismatic church is the way we worship, through loud music and open style.
the traditional churches on the other hand, is much more characterised by their concentration on the preaching of the Word. and also, their preaching against the teachings of the charismatics.their style of worship is more to the soothing kind, which in itself is also quite a good worship style.
Honestly, i don't realli think very highly of the way the traditional churches run their churches and their strong stand against the charismatics, and over the years, this "resentment" had build up a little. I had thought that their teachings were rather warped and too restricting towards the Divine and the way He work, by claiming the cessation of the gifts of the Spirit. Nevertheless, during the convo i had, i met myself at a point where i start to really thing,
is there something, if not anything, that we can learn from the traditional churches?Take a step back and i soon realised that indeed,
WE DO HAVE STH TO LEARN FROM THEM. As i have said earlier and if your inference is right, charismatics are more towards
moving by the Spirit and the traditional church, more through
the Word. I, for one, do not claim i am balanced, just that i am neither here not there; not strong in the Spirit as yet, and neither strong in the Word, which i am indeed guilty.
Faith comes by hearing the message, no one can argue against that. Both ends will agree, for its biblical. Come, let me expound a little. For me and many other charismatics alike, what gets us moving and even wanting to move is when we hear about and see miracles happen right before our eyes. The lame can walk, the blind can see, the deaf can hear, the sick are healed, etc. We base our faith and our belief on what we witness, if it is parallel to the message, and this sort of become our testimonies of sorts. The trouble comes when we start to
do not see these things happening, esp when our lives start to get busy and we do not have the extra time to drive down to churhc for the healing crusades going on. Then, we start to forget abt God just like the Israelites forgotten abt God right after crossing the Red Sea. Then, our faith dwindle and our belief seem to be of non-existence.
somewhere else in the Holy book, i think, after this verse, goes sth like,
and the message is heard through the word of Christ. The traditional churches on the other hand, base their christian experience on the Word. The reading and interpretation of the Word. Its The Word, The Word, The Word, and more of The Word. And of course, there will be the fellowship.
Evaluating deeper though,
dont we more often hear of charismatic believers backslide rather than those from the traditinonal churches? With all due respect, i hold charismatic churches like CHC and FCBC with high regards, and i even endorse their teachings, but being at grassroot level really show me the two sides to the coin. To start with, many of my backsliden friends or people i know, they are from these 2 churches. The church i am attending also do have a problem with such. really heart breaking. Well, thats most likely cos they
(young christians) mistaken the Spiritual hype as the whole of the christian experience. When the hype dies off, they, being new and unacustom are much less kept accountable by the church. The number of backsliding charismatic christians are much magnified in a mega church i guess; makes situations much easier to observe, though i am sure this is the same scenario in almost every charismatic-like churches. Also, since we base our whole experience in the spirital realm,
which when infered, means, our experience only happens in church when the pastor lay hands on us, we tend to lack the daily dose of the Word we need,
and feel ok with it. i for one, is more often than not, guilty, like Ty put it. It is therefore not hard to find one charismatic believer who do not even know the 10 commandments,
much less abide to it, do not do QT regularly(
regularly does not means once every year, but more of at least a few times a week, although its supposed to be a daily thing), who do not behave themselves outwardly by indulging in the pleasures of the flesh like gambling, swearing, and other vices. To conclude the charismatic side of the story, we simply do not have enough of The Word as we should have.
On the other hand, the traditional churches teachings do hold some weight, and in being so, manage to keep a large part of their followers. Their concentration on the Word makes their christian lifestyle defined wholly by the Word, and this is a
super plus point for them. Backslidin is not often heard from these denominations, and their behaviour in public is more often than not, much more comfortable to live with. Since they base their belief on the written Word, it is a more physical foundation. The Word(bible) will never run away. And of course, when u study the Word, it does speaks fourth sufferin of the saints, therefore, when met with trials and tribulations, a likely scenario is that a bible-nerdy christian will fair much much better than a charismatic one who does not practice his/her faith.
In conclusion, i think that for the church to split into so many denominations, on first thought, its a depressing thing. We are one in the body of Christ yet under so many different school of theology. However, on second thoughts, arent these different schools of theologies defining the different effective ways of governance within the church, i.e. via eldership board, pastorial board blah blah. As such, we have much to learn from one another's way of running our faith. What have we based our beliefs on? Through what we read or what we see? i'll take both. What are our testimonies? Is it what we see, or what we are? Remember the verse, "..
so that others will see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven."? i'll think that, we, as the living light, our testimonies should also not be more of the miracles we see,than the untold yet
significant change in the way we lead our lives to Jesus-likeness. This is what we should use to witness;
our changed lives.